Universal Sportsbook Start Dates vs. Staggered Start Dates 

Jump straight to the content

Written By Chris Gerlacher on October 4, 2022
Massachusetts lawmakers sports betting meeting

The implementation of sports betting in Massachusetts remains delayed due to a significant debate over whether it should have a uniform launch date or be rolled out gradually. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, but they do not impact both sides equally. A universal start date would be advantageous for all sportsbooks, whereas a staggered launch would benefit Massachusetts sports bettors. Let’s examine the pros and cons of each option.

Universal Sportsbook Start Date vs. Staggered Start Date

The discussion surrounding whether sportsbooks should adopt a universal start date or a staggered start date is centered on a game theory issue. With a universal sportsbook start date, all the sportsbooks would commence operations simultaneously. Conversely, a staggered start date implies that sportsbooks would launch as they obtain approval.

The advantages for sports bettors are evident. With a staggered start date, sportsbooks would be able to go live earlier. Consequently, sports betting would commence as soon as the first sportsbook operator obtains approval to go live.

On the other hand, launching first would provide an advantage in acquiring customers for the sportsbook. Establishing an early lead is crucial for maintaining it in the long run. While any book can entice customers with welcome bonuses, establishing a lasting relationship goes beyond mere advertisements. Building a strong customer retention strategy relies on active user engagement within the app, making market access a vital factor.

If Massachusetts sportsbooks had advance knowledge of the order in which they would launch, their strategies might vary. A sportsbook that knew it would be the first to enter the market could plan for a gradual launch, as it would anticipate enjoying the advantages of customer loyalty and a larger market share in the long run.

However, the order in which the books will be licensed and approved for launch is unknown. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission is currently overwhelmed with numerous applications, including those for sportsbooks, betting kiosks, and technology providers. Even experienced sportsbooks with legal teams specializing in license applications cannot guarantee being the first ones approved.

Due to the uncertainty of being the first to market and the low likelihood for each individual sportsbook to achieve this, they have decided to collaborate and support a universal launch.

Headline: Absence of MA Sports Betting This Football Season Leads to $5 Million Monthly Loss in Tax Revenue

Massachusetts Sportsbook Applicants 

The sportsbook applicants in Massachusetts comprise well-known major brands that bettors are likely familiar with. These include prominent names such as:

Although there are other sportsbook brands also interested in licensing, these happen to be some of the biggest ones. If any of them were to launch before the rest, they would gain a significant long-term advantage. Moreover, each of these brands provides substantial welcome bonuses in the new markets they enter, which could attract a large number of bettors initially.

In other markets, every sportsbook brand provides a welcome bonus of at least $1,000, with Caesars Sportsbook going slightly higher at $1,250. These generous bonus amounts are highly enticing and could rapidly attract numerous bettors to sign up. By retaining these bettors, sportsbooks can then offer smaller bonuses for their preferred events, ensuring customer satisfaction.

After selecting a preferred sportsbook, bettors may hesitate to register with another one. Unlike setting up a new email account or joining Twitter, signing up for an online sportsbook involves providing personal information like social security numbers and often submitting government-issued IDs and utility bills for verification.

These strict measures guarantee that sportsbooks prevent money launderers or terrorists from receiving sportsbook winnings. However, they also introduce registration procedures that bettors may prefer to complete only once.

Although Massachusetts sports bettors may be eager for early sports betting opportunities, the sportsbooks are prioritizing a synchronized launch of the Massachusetts sports betting industry. This approach aims to create a more competitive environment, resulting in a slightly delayed but more impactful launch.