Casinos, Mayor Tell Massachusetts To Take It Easier On Convicts

Casino employees endure a significant level of scrutiny, as high-ranking casino executives are evaluated by gaming commissions. Moreover, nearly all gaming staff members are subjected to drug tests and background checks.

To put it differently, the gambling industry goes to great lengths to guarantee safety and security. Nevertheless, the Massachusetts Casino Commission recently held a meeting where they discussed the possibility of easing some of these stringent regulations.

Gaming commission strict about past criminal records

At the commission’s meeting on May 25, the primary topic of discussion revolved around the standards pertaining to casino employment. Representatives from the casinos recognized the necessity for stringent criteria for gaming staff. However, they expressed a desire for flexibility in non-gaming positions. Specifically, the company expressed an interest in expanding employment opportunities for individuals with criminal records.

MGM Springfield President Michael Mathis questioned the legislature’s decision to subject CEOs of MGM and Wynn to the same licensing standard as an entry-level dishwasher.

Out of the 3,000 job openings at the upcoming MGM Springfield property in Massachusetts, 1,000 positions are unrelated to gaming. The company aims to widen the pool of applicants for these roles, as they do not necessitate a completely flawless background.

At present, the Gaming Act of the state incorporates a background check known as Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI). This check reveals a range of offenses, including severe felonies, along with several misdemeanors such as minor drug possession and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Many individuals who are interested in working at MGM and other Massachusetts casinos are restricted from being hired due to the CORI disqualifier in the Gaming Act.

Springfield mayor agrees with casinos

In addition to the casinos, Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno also addressed the meeting, aligning himself with their advocacy for change in the Gaming Act.

Sarno stated that although he identifies as a law and order mayor, he finds it ironic that certain situations may require some flexibility and allowance.

Sarno pointed out the elevated unemployment rate in Springfield as a factor to contemplate change. Springfield’s unemployment rate is notably higher compared to the rest of the state. Additionally, the stringent CORI standards disproportionately impact minority groups and individuals living in poverty.

Several local leaders, including City Council members from Springfield, have united in support of Sarno and MGM by signing a letter.

MA House Speaker Robert Deleo, one of the opponents, believes that casinos should be postponed until they have actually opened. He suggests that the group should then evaluate the effectiveness of employment laws in place.

How to change the casino employment laws?

During the meeting, the Casino Commission abstained from voting on the issue. This decision was partly influenced by their uncertainty regarding their authority to implement such a change.

Indeed, the group is responsible for supervising the progress of casino development within the state. Nevertheless, due to the fact that the Gaming Act has implemented these employment regulations, there are apprehensions that any modifications must be enacted through legislative means.

The photo was taken by 4kclips / Shutterstock.com.